Cases 1 - 10 of 17
FCA US LLC v. MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11165
Plaintiff:
FCA US LLC
Defendant:
MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions LLC and Metform LLC a/k/a Metform Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Handel v. MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions, LLC
as 1:2020cv00711
Defendant:
MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions, LLC, d/b/a Metform, LLC d/b/a MacLean Fogg Company and MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Timothy Handel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Handel v. MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions, LLC
as 3:2020cv50068
Plaintiff:
Timothy Handel
Defendant:
MacLean-Fogg Component Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MacLean Fogg Component Solutions v. Automotive Lighting, LLC
as 5:2019cv13001
Defendant:
Automotive Lighting, LLC
Plaintiff:
MacLean Fogg Component Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv50284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv50282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv50283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
MacLean-Fogg Company et al v. Guangzhou Hotlink Hardware Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv06796
Plaintiff:
MacLean-Fogg Company and MacLean Power, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Guangzhou Hotlink Hardware Co., Ltd. and David Zhang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
