Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Freeman v. Madison County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05065
Plaintiff:
Justin Freeman
Defendant:
Madison County, Arkansas and Lynn Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mahoney v. Geraldi's of Berryville, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05023
Plaintiff:
Lauren Madison Mahoney
Defendant:
Geraldi's of Berryville, Inc. doing business as Geraldi's of Fayetteville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Madison v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2022cv05210
Plaintiff:
Amy Madison
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adkins et al v. Flash Market LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Khurshonda Adkins, Elizabeth Alvarez, Jalyn Anthony and others
Defendant:
Flash Market LLC and PFMFC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kelly v. Madison County Public Defenders Office
as 5:2022cv05175
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ryan Kelly
Defendant:
Madison County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Carlton-Lee v. Elkins
as 2:2022cv02038
Plaintiff:
Ellen Madison Carlton-Lee and Ellen Madison Gill
Defendant:
Dr. Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison Heights II LP et al v. ITEX Property Management LLC
as 4:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Madison Heights II, LP, MHA HAGM LP and Madison Heights II LP
Counter Defendant:
University Heights Associates LP
Counter Claimant:
ITEX Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
