Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Monk et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00043
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Monk, Ronald Lee Grubb, David Keith Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
White v. Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Latawerence W. White
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department, Mobile Police Department, Mawss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carey v. Knight et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Ms. Knight and Mail Room Clerks at Kilby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Summler et al
as 2:2013cv00840
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis
Defendant:
William Martin Summler and U Got Mail Transporter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones , Sandra Giles , Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Baldwin County et al
as 1:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
Baldwin County, Sheriff Mack, Major Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00170
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mathis
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Louis Boyd , Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dallas County et al
as 2:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
Stanley L. Brown
Defendant:
Dallas County, Dallas County Jail, Warden Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talavera et al v. Adams et al
as 2:2010cv03588
Plaintiff:
Ruben Talavera and Margarita L Romero
Defendant:
Timothy L Adams and Mail Contractors of America Inc
Counter_claimant:
Mail Contractors of America Inc
Counter_defendant:
Ruben Talavera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
