Cases
Zodoq-El v. State of Oklahoma We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv01088
Petitioner: Nanya Maluk Zodoq-El
Respondent: State of Oklahoma, Department of Corrections and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIRK v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00261
Plaintiff: DEANTHONY KIRK
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS doing business as SCI ALBION, LONNIE OLIVER, PATTY THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ANGLE v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff: BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant: LT. SMITH, LT. FROEHLICH, CO1 GUYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Jones v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv02352
Defendant: Rex Wertz, Sipple, James Barnackle and others
Plaintiff: Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv02548
Plaintiff: Marcellus Jones
Defendant: John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALUK v. PRUITT et al
as 1:2013cv00131
Plaintiff: EILEEN S. MALUK
Defendant: MICHAEL PRUITT and ESTES EXPRESS LINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
MALUK v. PRUITT et al
as 2:2013cv01726
Plaintiff: EILEEN S. MALUK
Defendant: MICHAEL PRUITT and ESTES EXPRESS LINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Maluke v. Lake Township et al
as 5:2009cv02710
Plaintiff: Edward Maluke
Defendant: Lake Township, Ellis Erb, Galen Stoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Zodoq-El v. Winchester
as 5:2008cv00321
Petitioner: Nanya Maluk Zodoq-El
Respondent: Bill Winchester
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?