Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hasenbank v. Gronniger et al
as 5:2020cv04082
Defendant:
Don Gronniger, Mandy Jone and Dan Gronniger
Plaintiff:
Heather Hasenback and Heather Hasenbank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Lancaster Lumber, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00259
Plaintiff:
Mandy Jones and Wesley Jones
Defendant:
Lutz Construction, LLC, John W. Lutz, Lancaster Lumber, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13544
Plaintiff:
MANDY JONES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. George's Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv05125
Plaintiff:
Nurse Mandy Jones and Mandy James
Defendant:
Glen Balch and George's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hasenbank v. Jones
as 5:2018cv04024
Plaintiff:
Heather Hasenbank
Defendant:
Mandy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Brown v. Sheriff Danny Hickman, et al
as 15-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Ray Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Danny Hickman and Jason Day, Jail Administrator
Defendant:
Bob King, Detective Ryan Watson, Sue Fallon, Boon County Jail Secretary and others
Daniel Brown v. Sheriff Mike Moore, et al
as 15-3044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Ray Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Mike Moore, Jail Administrator Jason Day, Nurse Mandy Jones and others
Defendant:
Detective Ryan Watson and Captain Bob King
Gatlin v. Moore et al
as 3:2014cv03049
Plaintiff:
Perry Joe Gatlin
Defendant:
Mike Moore, Mandy Jones and Jason Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv03056
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Defendant:
Mike Moore, Jason Day, Mandy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Jones et al
as 3:2013cv03021
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Dees
Defendant:
Mandy Jones, Jason Day, Mike Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
