Cases 1 - 6 of 6
David Gunter v. Southern Health Partners Incorporated
as 21-2183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RAY GUNTER
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS INCORPORATED, JASON JUNKINS, Medical Director, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Martin Ventress v. David Kilgore, et al
as 21-55433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN VENTRESS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK GHALY, California Secretary of Health and Human Services, KEN PAXTON, Attorney General Texas Child Support Services, DIRECTOR DAVID KILGORE, California Department of Child Support Services and others
Martin Ventress v. David Kilgore et al
as 8:2020cv02192
Defendant:
Director David Kilgore, Ken Paxton, DOES 1 to 10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Ventress doing business as Martin Ventress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amy Bryant v. Jim Woodall
as 19-1685
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMY BRYANT, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, ELIZABETH DEANS, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, BEVERLY GRAY, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JIM WOODALL, In his official capacity as District Attorney ("DA") for Prosecutorial District ("PD") 15B, ELEANOR E. GREENE, In her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board, MANDY K. COHEN, In her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services; and their employees, agents, and successors and others
SPINKS v. COHEN et al
as 1:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
GARRETT AVON SPINKS
Defendant:
MANDY K. COHEN, THOMAS PRICE and PAMELA HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Eastpointe Human Services v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
Eastpointe Human Services
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services , Nash County , Trillium Health Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
