Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Littleton et al v. Auto Reflections, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03589
Plaintiff:
Erskine Littleton , Prince Manuel , Fernandus Glass and others
Defendant:
Auto Reflections, Inc., Christopher Bourque and Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Campasino v. Manheim Remarketing Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00641
Defendant:
Manheim Remarketing Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Campasino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-17237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56594
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Great American Insurance Company v. Jackson, et al
as 3:2016cv02016
Defendant:
AFC Auto Finance Corporation, Alsbou Motors, Inc., Arizona RV Centers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hudson Insurance Company v. Roman Motors LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01831
Defendant:
Cross Point NW LLC, Manheim Remarketing, Inc. abn Manheim Portland, Ashley McCalpin and others
Plaintiff:
Hudson Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manheim Remarketing, Inc. v. Carolina Auto Exports, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Carolina Auto Exports, Inc. and Tariq Alsarraj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
