Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anderson et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 5:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Manuel Anderson and Cheryl Anderson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
ANDERSON v. CENTURION HEALTH CARE et al
as 5:2020cv00113
Plaintiff:
RODNEY MANUEL ANDERSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH CARE, GLEN HANCOCK, LOUIS LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Anderson et al
as 5:2018cv04081
Defendant:
Iris Anderson, Manuel Anderson and The Unknown Heirs, Executors, Administrators, Devisees, Trustees, Legatees, Creditors, and Assignees of such of the defendants as may be deceased, et al.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ZAVALETA et al v. SIKORSKY GLOBAL HELICOPTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03251
Plaintiff:
GLORIA ZAVALETA and MANUEL ANDERSON
Defendant:
SIKORSKY GLOBAL HELICOPTERS, INC. and AVIATION PERSONNEL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Rodney Anderson
as 15-12056
Petitioner:
In re: RODNEY MANUEL ANDERSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Manuel Anderson v. Sikorsky Support Svc, Inc.
as 14-41386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SIKORSKY SUPPORT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Sikorsky Aero-Space Maintenance
Anderson v. Sikorsky
as 2:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Manuel Anderson
Defendant:
Sikorsky Support Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Rodney Anderson v. Sam Culpepper, et al
as 11-12065
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY MANUEL ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SAM CULPEPPER and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Anderson v. Culpepper, et al.
as 3:2008cv00083
Petitioner:
Rodney Manuel Anderson
Respondent:
Sam Culpepper and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
