Cases 1 - 10 of 15
21st Mortgage Corporation v. Bender et al
as 7:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Neil Carmichael Bender, II, Matthew W Ring, Abbott Park MHC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Maples v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2020cv00173
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Catherine Atkinson Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCCLARY v. HAFEZE et al
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
FNU HAFEZE, FNU MAPLES, FNU MARTINEZ and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - FOREST LANE, LLC, ET AL. v. NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00742
Plaintiff:
STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - FOREST LANE, LLC, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - GRACE BROOK, LLC, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROPERTIES - FOREST OAKS, LLC and others
Defendant:
JARRETT D. LAWS, HEATHER W. DOTSON, CHRIS M. COZART and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
MCNEILL v. POOLE et al
as 1:2017cv00924
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, GEORGE SOLOMON, SHANNON MAPLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeill v. Poole et al
as 5:2017ct03038
Plaintiff:
James C. McNeill
Defendant:
Katy Poole, George Solomon, Shannon Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAPLES v. USA
as 1:2015cv00561
Petitioner:
ROBERT EUGENE MAPLES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WOMACK v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY LEWIS WOMACK
Defendant:
COVINGTON, YOUNGER, MAPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Beale et al
as 5:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Turner
Defendant:
Crystal Sain Beale , Scott Maple , W. David Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFADDEN v. GAUSE et al
as 1:2014cv00801
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM B. MCFADDEN
Defendant:
GAUSE, SIMMOS, DALGADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
