Cases 1 - 10 of 31
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. TINSTMAN et al
as 2:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHAN TINSTMAN, JOSEPH ESTEP, JEREMIAH L. KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jackson v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2022cv05959
Plaintiff:
Jackson Jerell and Jerell Marshon Jackson
Defendant:
Todd E Goodwin, Sgt Brian Schuetter, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Slyke v. Snohomish County Sheriff's Office Corrections Bureau
as 2:2022cv01531
Plaintiff:
Marc R Van Slyke and Marc Richard Van Slyke
Defendant:
Snohomish County Sheriff's Office Corrections Bureau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHODES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19580
Plaintiff:
MARC RICHARD RHODES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47727
Plaintiff:
MARC RICHARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curley v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 19-387
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marc Richard Curley
RONZIO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2018mc00051
Petitioner:
JOSEPH RONZIO and MARC RICHARD WINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
WINE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2018mc00052
Petitioner:
MARC RICHARD WINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00718
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
Marc Richard Curley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
