Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McNeal v. McClain et al
as 5:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marcel McNeal
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mboule v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01532
Petitioner:
Eric Marcel Mboule
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Marcel Campbell
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jervis Brown, Hernaadis Harmon, Barry Cobb and others
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Patrice Richie Jones and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Derrick Marcel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Davis et al (MAG+)
as 3:2019cv00813
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Phenix City Police Department, Kenneth Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Marcel Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2019cv00088
Plaintiff:
Domineque Hakim Marcelle Ray
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc
Campbell v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00876
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Sgt Schoceder, Heath Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Marcel Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Cardaryl Freeman
Defendant:
Gerald Allen, Billy Beasley, Scott Beason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Thomas
as 2:2012cv02526
Petitioner:
Renard Marcel Daniel
Respondent:
Kim T Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
