Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13405
Plaintiff: Marcell Smith
Defendant: Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bloom v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-259
Plaintiff / Appellee: Margaret Sepe, Melissa Molly, as Parent and Natural Guardian of M.M., Wally Reynolds and others
Defendant / Appellant: Roy's Plumbing, Inc., Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, City of Niagara Falls and others
Bloom et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00143
Plaintiff: Faith E. Rivers, Richard Rogers, Jr., Frank Starks, Sr. and others
Defendant: Occidental Chemical Corporation, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Smith v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2018cv08067
Plaintiff: Marcell Smith
Defendant: Mr. Bailey, Social Security Administration and Ms. Conta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE
as 1:2017cv02287
Plaintiff: TYRONE MARCEL SMITH
Defendant: UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bass et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Plaintiff: Marcel Smith
Defendant: G. Bass, A. Burt, B. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv02501
Plaintiff: Marcell Smith
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Stephens
as 1:2013cv00203
Petitioner: Standridge Marcell Smith
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marcel Smith v. Raymond Booker
as 10-1271
Petitioner - Appellant: MARCEL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: RAYMOND BOOKER
Smith v. Booker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv15274
Petitioner: Marcel Smith
Respondent: Raymond Booker
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?