Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pham et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
John Pham, Diana Lazarte, Marco Cuevas and others
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Avenue5 Residential LLC, BH Management Services, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Pham et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01744
Plaintiff:
John Pham, Diana Lazarte, Marco Cuevas and others
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Avenue5 Residential LLC, BH Management Services LLC and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Pham et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as WAW/2:22-CV-01744
Plaintiff:
Pham, John Pham, Diana Lazarte and others
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Avenue5 Residential LLC, BH Management Services LLC and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro
Gomez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00657
Plaintiff:
Veronica Trevino Garza, Individually and A/N/F o Vxxxxxxx Txxxxxx, a Minor, Santana Arias Gomez, Jesus Esparza, Individually and A/N/F of Axxxx Exxxxxx, a Minor and others
Defendant:
NSK, Ltd, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK Precision America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. QUIROGA et al
as 7:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ARMANDINA QUIROGA , MARCOS CUEVAS and MARIA E QUIROGA
Counter_claimant:
ARMANDINA QUIROGA
Counter_defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuevas v. New York City Department of Correction et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cuevas
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Cuevas-Rodriguez
as 08-2132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCO CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
