Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys, et al
as 22-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cornice & Rose International, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Four Keys, LLC, First Security Bank & Trust Co., Perry Novak Electric, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Marco Technologies, LLC, Young Construction, Ltd., Kamm Excavating Corp. and others
Gibson v. Marco Technologies LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03580
Defendant:
Marco Technologies LLC, David Porter and David S. Porter
Plaintiff:
Heather Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv02097
Defendant:
Brian Young, Young Construction, Ltd, Northern Cedar Service Co, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cornice & Rose International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00115
Defendant:
BRIAN YOUNG, YOUNG CONSTRUCTION, LTD, PERRY NOVAK ELECTRIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Cornice & Rose International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Marco Technologies, LLC v. Midkiff et al
as 0:2019cv02323
Defendant:
Dan Urzendowski and Keith Midkiff
Plaintiff:
Marco Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bjorgen v. Marco Technologies, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv01232
Plaintiff:
Kurt Bjorgen
Defendant:
Marco Technologies LLC and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marco Technologies, LLC v. Zieske et al
as 0:2017cv04538
Plaintiff:
Marco Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
David Zieske and Kurt Bjorgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bjorgen v. Marco Technologies, LLC et al
as 9:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Kurt Bjorgen
Defendant:
Marco Technologies, LLC and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
