Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Ortiz v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00246
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44610
Plaintiff:
MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. Kinard
as 21-40582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant / Appellee:
John D. Kinard, District Attorney, Jeth Jones, Attorney, Lonnie Cox, Judge and others
Ortiz v. Kinard et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Lonnie Cox, Maria Mercado, John D Kinard and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00041
Petitioner:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Almonte et al v. Washington Heights Wireless, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08848
Plaintiff:
Nestor Batista, Yael Almonte, Marcos Ortiz and others
Defendant:
Washington Heights Wireless, Inc., STP Rockaway, Inc., Bronx Metro Wireless, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Ortiz v. Lumpkin
as 20-40702
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Marcos Ortiz v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-40508
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcos Ortiz
Respondent / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ortiz v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2020cv00217
Defendant:
C. Downey, County of San Joaquin, J. Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2020at00094
Defendant:
C. DOWNEY, County of San Joaquin, J. MENDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
