Cases 1 - 10 of 3,580
Gonzalez etal v. Jay Management Company LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00301
Defendant:
Robert Hilton Adams, Liberty County TX, Jay Management Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Miriam Gonzalez, Gricelda Becerra, Carlos Argueta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC) Gaviola Patron v. Hugh, et al
as 1:2024cv00655
Defendant:
Lewy Hugh, G. Herara and C. Mares
Plaintiff:
D'Annunzio Roman Gaviola Patron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/24
as 3:2024mc80145
Unknown:
Krishna Kumar Yerur, Ferdinand Carbonell Malimban, Teodoro Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States Of America v. Guardarrama et al
as 1:2024cv21674
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Israel Guardarrama, Marelys Perez and Unknown Tenants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Gallosa Rodriguez v. Diana Smoke Shop Corp.
as 1:2024cv21197
Plaintiff:
Marelys Gallosa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Diana Smoke Shop Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Enriquez v. Mares
as 6:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Respondent:
Warden FNU Mares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
