Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chrisco v. Bartlow et al
as 1:2017cv01799
Plaintiff:
Luke Irvin Chrisco
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch, John Hickenlooper, Donald Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Heil et al
as 1:2013cv01098
Defendant:
Margaret Heil and Anthony P. Young
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crosby v. Heil, et al
as 12-1136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JAMES CROSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET HEIL, J.D. SCOLLARD, CHRISTINE TYLER and others
Blum v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv02257
Plaintiff:
James F. Blum
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Travis (I) Trani, Travis Trani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roe v. Heil et al
as 1:2011cv01983
Plaintiff:
James Roe
Defendant:
Margaret (I) Heil and Margaret Heil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Heil, et al
as 11-1335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET HEIL, in her official capacity as Acting Manager of the Colorado Department of Corrections Sex Offender Treatment and Monitoring Program and ARISTEDES ZAVAROS, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections
Miller v. Heil et al
as 1:2010cv02913
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jon Miller
Defendant:
Margaret Heil, Richard (I) G. Lins, Richard G. Lins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2010cv02171
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Heil et al
as 1:2010cv00951
Plaintiff:
David James Crosby
Defendant:
Margaret Heil, J. D. Scollard, Christine Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv02654
Plaintiff:
Alex Medina
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Margaret (I) Heil and Margaret Heil
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
