Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Castaneda v. YOUNG et al
as 6:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Maria D Castaneda
Defendant:
CHARLES L YOUNG and BLACKHAWK TRANSPORT, INC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Castaneda v. Young et al.
as 6:2022cv00113
Defendant:
CHARLES L YOUNG, BLACKHAWK TRANSPORT, INC, Charles Young and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Maria D Castaneda
Plaintiff:
Maria Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Castaneda v. YOUNG et al
as 6:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Maria D Castaneda
Defendant:
CHARLES L YOUNG and BLACKHAWK TRANSPORT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00338
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abarca et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv00947
Plaintiff:
Eunice Gomez, Jean L. Davis, Monica Arce and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Castaneda v. USA
as 4:2016cv00720
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maria Esther Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Castaneda v. Varrenti et al
as 6:2014cv06630
Plaintiff:
Maria C. Castaneda
Defendant:
Daniel Varrenti , Mark T. Cuzzupoli and The Village of Brockport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACEVEDO et al v. SUPERVALU, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv01081
Plaintiff:
VICTOR ACEVEDO and MARIA ACEVEDO CASTANEDA
Defendant:
SUPERVALU, INC. and ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
California River Watch v. Castaneda et al
as 3:2013cv01700
Plaintiff:
California River Watch
Defendant:
Humberto Castaneda and Maria Bertha Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oscar Ramos-Bolanos, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71271
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARMANDO RAMOS-BOLANOS and NELLY MELIDA ASCENCIO-BOLANO, AKA Maria Guadalupe Castaneda-Garcia
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
