Cases 11 - 20 of 52
American Small Business League v. Maria Contreras-Sweet
as 16-17096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIA CONTRERAS-SWEET, in her capacity as Administrator of the United States Small Business Administration
DIBS US Inc. v. Contreras-Sweet
as 4:2016cv03173
Plaintiff:
DIBS US Inc.
Defendant:
Maria Contreras-Sweet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
USA v. Maria Contrera
as 16-11281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIA GUADALUPE CONTRERAS, also known as Maria Contreras, also known as Guadalupe Maria Conteras, also known as Guadalupe Contreras
ACH Properties, Inc. et al v. Contreras-Sweet
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
ACH Properties, Inc. and Alon Carmeli
Defendant:
Maria Contreras-Sweet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowe et al v. TNG Waxing LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03112
Defendant:
Douglas Bauer, Maria Contreras, DSN Waxing llc and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Boone and Jasmine Lowe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Contreras v. Polo Mex, Inc.
as 8:2016cv01271
Plaintiff:
Maria Contreras
Defendant:
Polo Mex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
American Small Business League v. Maria Contreras-Sweet
as 3:2016cv02410
Plaintiff:
American Small Business League
Defendant:
Maria Contreras-Sweet
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ladany et al v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 1:2016cv03871
Plaintiff:
Scott D. Ladany and SDL Building Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration and Maria Contreras-Sweet
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 631
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
