Cases 1 - 10 of 212
United States v. Carlos Morales Mariscal
as 24-1944
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Ulices Morales Mariscal, also known as Carlos Uleces Rodriges Gamboa, also known as Pecha
Roberto Garcia Mariscal v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03668
Plaintiff:
Roberto Garcia Mariscal
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Vita et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Coney v. LVMPD Michael Lozo et al
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
William Coney
Defendant:
LVMPD Michael Lozo, A. Mariscal, PO J. Brandon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ramos Mariscal v. Garland
as 24-1710
Petitioner:
LUIS RODOLFO RAMOS MARISCAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mariscal v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv05948
Plaintiff:
Theresa P Mariscal
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Coney v. Lozo et al
as 2:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
William Coney
Defendant:
Officer Michael Lozo, Officer A. Mariscal, Joseph Lombardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARISCAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34286
Plaintiff:
ROGELIO MARISCAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
