Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Harrison et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03299
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Harrison, William Patrick Flores, John Alan Fluck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Harrison et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00800
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Harrison, William Patrick Flores, John Alan Fluck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
HENRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv08617
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61557
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goff Dairy, LLC v. Henry
as 4:2019cv02250
Plaintiff:
Goff Dairy LLC and Goff Dairy, LLC
Defendant:
Mark A Henry, Jr. and Mark A. Henry, Jr.
Diaz Reyes et al v. W. D. Henry & Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01017
Plaintiff:
Hector Ivan Burgos Rivera, Jose A. Garcia Marrero, Kidanny Josue Martinez Reyes and others
Defendant:
Mark C. Henry, Henry Realty Associates, Inc., W. D. Henry & Sons, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Henry v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04735
Respondent:
New York City Department of Corrections, City of New York, State of New York and others
Petitioner:
Mark Q. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv02928
Plaintiff:
Mark Q. Henry
Defendant:
City of New York, State of New York, New York City Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
