Cases 21 - 30 of 281
Webster v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08242
Petitioner:
Jasper Ian Webster
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Longoria v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02203
Petitioner:
Hector Longoria
Respondent:
David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and Acting Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Longoria v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08244
Petitioner:
Hector Longoria
Defendant:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Harris v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 22-16991
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Jason Harris v. State of Arizona, et al
as 22-16990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON LEE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Robert Yazzie v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16963
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE YAZZIE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Joyner v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02152
Plaintiff:
Mark A Joyner
Defendant:
David Shinn, Mark Brnovich, Karen O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Reyes
as 4:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Unknown Reyes, David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turcios v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01952
Petitioner:
Christian Salvador Turcios
Respondent:
David Shinn, Mark Brnovich and Joe Profiri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray Hooper v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MURRAY HOOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, of Arizona and MICHAEL SULLIVAN, Interim Police Chief, City of Phoenix
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
