Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Mark Adams v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
as 20-40507
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
CAMPBELL et al v. ALLERGAN PLC et al
as 2:2020cv09956
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WALKER, TAMMY ORGERON, JENNIFER DOUGLAS and others
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC., ALLERGAN PLC and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
In Re:
IN RE: ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00340
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2020cv00610
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Davis
as 6:2020cv00508
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00305
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00295
Petitioner:
Mark Douglas Adams
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GOOCH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03251
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK DOUGLAS GOOCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERGUSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00007
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK DOUGLAS FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1476
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
