Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Woods v. City of Claremore et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lance Martel Woods
Defendant:
City of Claremore, Claremore City Police Department, Stan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11621
Plaintiff:
MARK ISAAC STEVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yetter v. USA
as 3:2018cv00807
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark Isaac Yetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Snarr v. USA
as 1:2013cv00724
Petitioner:
Mark Isaac Snarr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Isaacs v. I C E et al
as 1:2013cv02425
Plaintiff:
Mark Isaacs
Defendant:
I C E, G E O, LaSalle Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Isaacs et al
as 1:2013cv01533
Plaintiff:
Seth M Harris
Defendant:
Mark Isaacs, Neil Isaacs, Hico Flex Brass Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08709
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Isaacs v. Commissioner Social Security
as 1:2012cv00777
Plaintiff:
Mark Isaacs
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
The Housing Outreach Fund X Limited Parnership et al v. NC Seniors Company et al
as 3:2012cv00424
Plaintiff:
The Housing Outreach Fund X Limited Parnership and The Norton Commons Legacy, LTD.
Defendant:
NC Seniors Company, Mark Isaacs and Sally Issaacs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
