Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00396
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01720
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthew Koch v. Katherine Gregory, et al
as 13-2080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW E. KOCH
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE GREGORY, in her individual capacity, STEVE SARRIS, in his individual capacity, MARK SCHUTTER, in his individual capacity and others
Matthew Koch v. Katherine Gregory, et al
as 11-3312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW E. KOCH
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE GREGORY, STEPHEN SARRIS, MARK SCHUTTER and others
Koch v. Gregory et al
as 3:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Koch
Defendant:
Katherine Gregory, Steve Sarris, Mark Schutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merryfield v. Jordan, et al
as 09-3002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
DON JORDAN, Secretary of Kansas SRS, in his official capacity, MARK SCHUTTER, Superintendent, Larned State Hospital, in his official capacity, BRENDA W. HAGERMAN, legal counsel for Larned State Hospital, in her official capacity and others
Merryfield v. Jordan et al
as 5:2007cv03289
Plaintiff:
Dustin J Merryfield
Defendant:
Don Jordan, Mark Schutter, Brenda Hagerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Jordan et al
as 5:2007cv03221
Plaintiff:
Richard A Miller
Defendant:
Don Jordan, Mark Schutter, Phill Ledford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
