Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Richard Ceja et al v. Beverly Hills Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv05884
Plaintiff:
Richard Ceja, Brian Weir and Finn O McClafferty
Defendant:
The City of Beverly Hills, The Beverly Hills Police Department, Capt. Mark Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kockum v. The We Company et al
as 4:2020cv03894
Defendant:
Bruce Dunlevie, Lewis Frankfort, John Zhao and others
Plaintiff:
Henriette Kockum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vernet v. The We Company et al
as 4:2020cv03686
Defendant:
Bruce Dunlevie, Lewis Frankfort, John Zhao and others
Plaintiff:
Malakyar Vernet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwartz et al v. Levokove et al
as 3:2020cv00727
Plaintiff:
Barbara Schwartz and Mark Schwartz
Defendant:
Dr. Zachary Levokove and Does 1 through 20,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv03346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Hos Brothers Construction, Inc. v. Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust et al
as 2:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Hos Brothers Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust , Chuck Mack , Rome Aloise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Riley v. Galena Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01748
Defendant:
Mark J. Ahn, Remy Bernarda, Kamilla Bjorlin and others
Plaintiff:
Hosie Kenneth Riley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Mark Schwartz v. USA
as 12-17133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK SCHWARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Schwartz v. United States Of America
as 3:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwartz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
