Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Cape Fear Bank
as 7:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
John Cameron Coburn, Larry Flowers, R. James MacLaren and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
The Authors Guild, Inc. et al v. Hathitrust et al
as 1:2011cv06351
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Inc. , The Australian Society Of Authors Limited , Union Des Ecrivaines Et Des Ecrivains Quebecois and others
Defendant:
Hathitrust, The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, The Regents of the University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Anthony v. Etue et al
as 2:2011cv13697
Defendant:
Kristie Kibbey Etue and Benny N. Napoleon
Plaintiff:
Mark Tyler Anthony
Tooling, Manufacturing v. Hartford Fire Insurance
as 10-2480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOOLING, MANUFACTURING AND TECHNOLOGIES ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Third Party:
MARK TYLER, TEAM MARKETING GROUP, INC., dba Tyler Construction, Incorporated, dba Team Benefits Group, Incorporated, dba Allied Risk, Incorporated and MARK TYLER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Abraham et al v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02096
Plaintiff:
Ilan Abraham, Edgardo Acosta Garcia, Ildefonso Acosta Garcia and others
Defendant:
Entrepreneur Media, Inc. and Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Mark Anthony v. Third Circuit Court, et al
as 08-2410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK TYLER ANTHONY
Defendant - Appellee:
THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, JAMES R. CHYLINSKI, Circuit Court Judge, WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Kreft v. JPS Restaurant Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Mark Tyler Kreft, Mark Tyler Kreft, Mark Tyler Kreft and others
Defendant:
JPS Restaurant Services, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
