Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delgado v. Raspberry et al
as 2:2024cv11088
Plaintiff:
Maria Delgado
Defendant:
Sarah Raspberry, Jamie Richardson, Shelly Sitton and others
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marquez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01220
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Marquez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calvin v. 201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Marquez Calvin
Defendant:
201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Hubble et al
as 2:2024cv10248
Plaintiff:
Terrion Harvey
Defendant:
Hubble, Marino, Mario and others
RIGGS et al v. Bartlett, City of, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
MR. DONALD RIGGS and CHRISTY RIGGS
Defendant:
Bartlett, City of, Tennessee, BENJAMIN ARMSTRONG, ZACHARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Traficanti et al.
as 4:2023cv02286
Plaintiff:
Marquez Thomas
Defendant:
Anthony Traficanti, David Ditzler, Coral Rimedio-Righetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03841
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Marquez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sandlin v. Stegall et al
as 2:2023cv02398
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sandlin
Defendant:
Marquez Stegall and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
