Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Arron Marqus Derick Louis v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv02578
Plaintiff:
Arron Marquis Derick Louis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hackney v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Darren Marquis Hackney
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marquis Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dixon v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Marquis Peirmen Dixon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tisdale v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06146
Plaintiff:
Marquis Tisdale and Marquis C. Tisdale
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BARNETT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv15574
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS D BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00361
Plaintiff:
Marquis A. Johnson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MARQUIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2019cv00487
Plaintiff:
CASEY-JO MARQUIS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marquis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv03014
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Trent Marquis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tolliver v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv08552
Plaintiff:
Marquies Tolliver
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
