Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86506
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAVON MARQUES MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02268
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does 1-5, Police Officer Christopher Kelley and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Marques Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Rutherford County Work Center, et al.
as 3:2011cv00813
Plaintiff:
Marques Martin
Defendant:
Rutherford County Work Center, The County of Rutherford County, Tennessee, f/n/u Salandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Martin et al
as 1:2008cv01084
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Marques Martin, Federal Correctional Complex Low and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Judd v. Bush, et al
as 08-41048
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and MARQUES MARTIN
Judd v. Bush, et al
as 08-40806
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and MARQUES MARTIN
Judd v. FCC, et al
as 08-40701
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and MARQUS MARTIN, Warden
Judd v. Martin, et al
as 08-40686
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
MARQUES MARTIN, Warden and FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOW
Judd v. Bush et al
as 1:2008cv00352
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
George W Bush and Marques Martin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Judd v. Martin, et al
as 08-40469
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
MARQUES MARTIN, Warden, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX LOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
