Cases 61 - 70 of 3,193
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY LOHMAN and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, A Professional Corporation
Defendant:
JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Fashion Exchange, LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC
as 23-7653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FASHION EXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
HYBRID PROMOTIONS, LLC, JARROD DOGAN, GAVIN DOGAN and others
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY LOHMAN, JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS and others
Defendant:
DAVID MIZE, IBRAHIM MUHTASEB, ALYSON DYKES and others
MARSHALL v. NATIONAL RECOVERY COLLECTION AGENCY et al
as 5:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
NATIONAL RECOVERY COLLECTION AGENCY, TRANS UNION and EXPERIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSHALL v. KAYBEE OF MACON et al
as 5:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MARSHALL
Defendant:
KAYBEE OF MACON, EQUIFAX and EMMETT L GOODMAND JR LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Christine Scott
as 23-13411
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTINE SCOTT
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Howell v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2023cv14607
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Howell
Defendant:
F.B.I., U.S. Marshals and U.S. Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
