Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
YUEN et al v. IDEXX LABORATORIES INC et al
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
CAM YUEN, ARRIANNA GARCIA, KATHRYN HEBERLING and others
Defendant:
IDEXX LABORATORIES INC and IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Yuen et al v. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04297
Plaintiff:
Cam Yuen, Arrianna Garcia, Kathryn Heberling and others
Defendant:
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. and IDEXX Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG et al
as 1:2019cv02232
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant:
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP., T-MOBILE US, INC., DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEW AMERICA'S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, HAL SINGER, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Petitioner:
NTCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019md02901
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith, Ryan Combs, Al Balls and others
In Re:
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Pacific Surf Designs, Inc. v. Whitewater West Industries, Ltd..r West et al
as 3:2020cv01464
Plaintiff:
Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Whitewater West Industries, Ltd., Thomas Lochtefeld, David Keim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
A & E Auto Body, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv00310
Plaintiff:
Stewart Agency, Inc. doing business as Earl Stewart Toyota of North Palm Beach, Regal Pontiac, Inc., American Paint & Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Security National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant:
Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor:
Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant:
Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant:
Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee:
Charles W Daff
Petitioner:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FRANCES E. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
