Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Panoche Energy Center, LLC v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
as 23-1268
Petitioner: PANOCHE ENERGY CENTER, LLC
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR OF REGION 9 OF U.S.
National Lifeline Association v. Marybel Batjer, et al
as 21-15969
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATIONAL LIFELINE ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant: GENEVIEVE SHIROMA, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, MARYBEL BATJER, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission, LIANE RANDOLPH, in her official capacity as a commissioner of the California Public Utilities Commission and others
S. Mendel v. Liane Randolph, et al
as 21-15910
Defendant: ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation, ANNE KRAMER, Attorney of the law firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., MICHAEL PICKER, in his individual and official capacity as President, Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: S. PATRICK MENDEL
National Lifeline Association v. Batjer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv08312
Defendant: Liane M. Randolph, Martha Guzman Aceves, Clifford Rechtschaffen and others
Plaintiff: National Lifeline Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Alex Cannara, et al v. Karla Nemeth, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16202
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN, California Public Utilities Commissioner, KARLA NEMETH, California Department of Water Resources Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALEX CANNARA, an individual and GENE A. NELSON, an individual
S. Mendel v. Elaine Chao, et al
as 19-17380
Defendant / Appellee: LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN P.C., a law firm, RAYMOND MARTINEZ, in his official capacity as Adminisrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: S. PATRICK MENDEL
S. Mendel v. USDC-CAOAK
as 19-72420
Not Yet Classified: MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission, RAISER-CA LLC, ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation and others
Petitioner: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Not Classified By Court: In re: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Cannara et al v. Nemeth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv04171
Defendant: Karla Nemeth, California Department of Water Resources, Marybel Batjer and others
Plaintiff: Gene A. Nelson and Alex Cannara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mendel v. Chao We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv03244
Plaintiff: S. Patrick Mendel and Sameh Fahmi Moustafa
Defendant: Elaine Chao, Raiser-CA, LLC, Ryan Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archie Overton, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16610
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARCHIE OVERTON and S. PATRICK MENDEL
Defendant - Appellee: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAISER-CA LLC, UBER USA, LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?