Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jones v. Uttecht
as 23-1655
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN A JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF UTTECHT, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Correctional Center
Martin Jones v. Michael Kaminski, et al
as 23-2256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN W. JONES
Debtor / Appellee:
TONY MARSAGLIA
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL KAMINSKI, FRANK NAJERA and JOSHUA MALLERY, Badge #99-30
Jones v. Uttecht
as 3:2022cv05371
Plaintiff:
Martin Arthur Jones and Martin A Jones
Defendant:
Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Johnson v. Drew Nelson, et al
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DREW NELSON, Ohio Highway Patrol, RICHLAND COUNTY JAIL, JUDGE JERRY E. AULT and others
Martin Jones v. Tony Marsaglia, et al
as 20-3640
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK NAJERO, JOSHUA MALLERY, Badge #99-30, TONY MARSAGLIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN W. JONES
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50213
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN W JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47505
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN W JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03964
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN WADE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. HENRY
as 1:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
MARTIN MONTAVIOUS JONES
Defendant:
TANGELA HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MARSAGLIA et al
as 2:2019cv04678
Defendant:
TONY MARSAGLIA, FRANK NAJERO, MICHAEL KAMINSKI and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN W. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
