Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Hernandez v. Lubbock Police Department
as 5:2018cv00254
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department
Plaintiff:
Martin Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02871
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gloria Hernandez and Martin Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez-Regalado v. USA
as 3:2018cv01126
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Junior Martin Hernandez-Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rucker v. Kallman et al
as 1:2017cv07876
Plaintiff:
Reginald Rucker
Defendant:
Daniel Kallman, Martin Hernandez, Darrick Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Ezell v. Jose Esquetini, et al
as 17-56038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY LAMELL EZELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN HERNANDEZ, in his capacity as a federal employee acting within the scope of his duties, and as an individual and JOSE ESQUETINI, in his capacity as a federal employee acting within the scope of his duties, and as an individual
USA v. Junior Hernandez-Regalado
as 17-10701
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUNIOR MARTIN HERNANDEZ-REGALADO
Martin Hernandez-Pena v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-70509
Petitioner:
MARTIN HERNANDEZ-PENA, AKA Martin Pena Hernandez
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. Daniel Perez-Morale
as 16-41534
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL PEREZ-MORALES, also known as Jose Santos Martinez, also known as Martin Hernandez, also known as Jose Martinez-Diaz, also known as Jose Luis Aguilar-Perez
Luis Hernandez Bravo v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-72850
Petitioner:
LUIS HERNANDEZ BRAVO, AKA Martin Hernandez
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
