Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sadler v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2021cv00041
Respondent:
Fletcher Michael, Abby Gruber, Billy Reich and others
Petitioner:
Timothy Ray Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martz v. Wolcott
as 9:2021cv00045
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Petitioner:
John Martz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martz v. Wolcott
as 1:2020cv01592
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Petitioner:
John Martz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martz v. Walcott
as 9:2020cv00620
Respondent:
Julie Walcott
Petitioner:
John Martz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martz v. Mooney
as 3:2013cv02570
Petitioner:
Dereck Martz
Respondent:
Vincent Mooney and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shawn Martz v. District Attorney Blair County, et al
as 12-2691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN MARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY, DAVID VARANO, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
MARTZ v. BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al
as 3:2012cv00088
Petitioner:
SHAWN MARTZ
Respondent:
BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY , BLAIR COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE , DAVID VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martz v. Blair County District Attorney et al
as 3:2012cv00763
Petitioner:
Shawn Martz
Respondent:
Blair County District Attorney, Blair County Probation Office, David Varano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martz v. Brunsman
as 5:2009cv01291
Petitioner:
Larry K. Martz
Respondent:
Tim Brunsman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 4:2007cv00108
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Warden Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert A. Fiatal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
