Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Feliberto Ramirez, Sr., et al v. Marvin Isgur, et al
as 13-20020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIBERTO RAMIREZ, SR., ISRAEL GARZA, ANITA RAMIREZ GARZA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARVIN ISGUR, Trial Judge, DEMETRIOS DAURTE, Esquire, MICHAEL B. SCHIMDT, Trustee and others
Garza et al v. Marvin et al
as 1:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Israel Garza and Anita Garza
Defendant:
Marvin Isgure, Michael B. Schmidt, Kevin Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ramirez et al v. Isgur et al
as 4:2012cv01246
Plaintiff:
Feliberto Ramirez, Sr, Israel Garza, Anita Ramirez Garza and others
Defendant:
Marvin Isgur , Demetrios Daurte Esq , Michael B. Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Garza v. Isgure et al
as 1:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Israel Garza
Defendant:
Marvin Isgure, Michael B Schmidt, Kevin P. Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kornman et al
as 4:2010cv03267
Petitioner:
Gary M Kornman , Steadfast Investments, L P , GMK Family Holdings, LLC and others
Respondent:
Marvin Isgur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Johnny Partain v. Marvin Isgur, et al
as 09-41129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY PARTAIN, Individually and doing business as Anti-Corruption Lawsuit Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
MARVIN ISGUR, Individually and in his capacity as Bankruptcy Judge, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMPASS BANK and others
Partain v. Isgur et al
as 7:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Johnny Partain
Defendant:
Marvin Isgur, James Maples and Texas State Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Partain v. Bravo et al
as 7:2007cv00092
Petitioner:
Johnny Partain
Respondent:
Bravo, Marvin Isgur, Texas State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Partain v. Isgur
as 7:2007cv00016
Petitioner:
Johnny Partain
Defendant:
Marvin Isgur and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
