Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23425
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Smith and Kenneth R. Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03595
Plaintiff:
MARY L. SMITH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
Mary L Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Albert Shade, et al v. Congress, et al
as 13-5185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Albert Shade, Maggie Hill, Huston Smith and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Congress, Government, House of Representatives of the U.S.A. and others
SHADE et al v. CONGRESS et al
as 1:2012cv01774
Plaintiff:
ALBERT SHADE, MAGGIE HILL, NINENETTE BRUTLEY and others
Defendant:
CONGRESS, GOVERNMENT, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03103
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Smith
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. DePuy Inc. et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-21210
Plaintiff:
Mary L Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Smith v. DePuy Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21210
Plaintiff:
Mary L Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dames et al v. City of New York
as 1:2011cv05953
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Grace A. Perkins, Chantel D. Hall, jeanette l. dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Farris Coley, David Riley, Mohd Hamid and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 6:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Elbert W. Smith and Mary L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
