Cases 1 - 6 of 6
The Fiscal Court of Breathitt County Kentucky et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States
as 3:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
The Fiscal Court of Mercer County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Mason County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Clinton County Kentucky and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
The Board of Education of Mason County, West Virginia et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States
as 3:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
The Board of Education of Marion County, West Virginia, The Board of Education of Mason County, West Virginia and The Board of Education of Wyoming County, West Virginia
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Board of Education of Thornton Township High Schools, District 205 et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45281
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of Fayette County Public Schools, Board of Education of Harrison County Public Schools, Board of Education of St. George Municipal School District and others
Defendant:
CVS Indiana L.L.C., Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a/ Watson Pharma, Inc., WALMART INC., f/k/a WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Fiscal Court of Mason County Kentucky v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45868
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
The Fiscal Court of Mason County Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Mason, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45112
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Mason, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mason, County of v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00032
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Mason, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
