Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mathis v. U S America
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
U S America and MDOC Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Mathis et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Julie Austin
Defendant:
Theresa Mathis, Broderick Rogers, Oxford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Mathis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
Peter Mathis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and M. Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mathis v. Kim
as 3:2020cv00213
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
Ronald Wayne Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Morris et al
as 4:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Warden Unknown Siamon, Unknown Mathis and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mathis v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00132
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Pelicia Hall
Petitioner:
James Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mathis v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Travis B. Mathis
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. The Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Wallace Williams and Glenda Williams
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company, Menard, Gates & Mathis, Inc., McDaniel-Whitley, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
South Delta Housing Authority v. Mathis
as 4:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
South Delta Housing Authority
Defendant:
Paul Mathis, Jr.
Counter_claimant:
Paul Mathis, Jr. and Paul Mathis, LLP
Counter_defendant:
South Delta Housing Authority and A. J. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
