Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Matos v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Molly Matos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
as 2:2023cv05038
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
MATOS v. BRIGHT et al
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MATOS
Defendant:
MR. J. BRIGHT and MS. LAURENE DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Almonte v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00622
Petitioner:
Fransisco Matos Almonte
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC, RASIER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Matos-Peguero v. Wertman
as 1:2023cv00435
Petitioner:
Jose Matos-Peguero
Respondent:
Warden Wertman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOMEZ v. MATOS TOWING et al
as 5:2022cv04371
Plaintiff:
LAWANDA GOMEZ
Defendant:
MATOS TOWING, MATTHEW GRIFFITH and WILLIAM FURSIN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holley, Jr. v. Matos et al
as 1:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Roderick R. Holley, Jr.
Defendant:
Israel Matos, Rebecca A. Davis, Tina M. Litz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ-PEREZ et al v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv02327
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CRUZ-PEREZ and MILAGROS AQUINO-MATOS
Defendant:
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, ASSURANT SPECIALTY PROPERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MATOS v. GM BERKSHIRE HILLS LLC
as 5:2021cv04855
Plaintiff:
LORRIE MATOS
Defendant:
GM BERKSHIRE HILLS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
