Cases 1 - 10 of 1,212
Fennell et al v. Matson Navigation Company of Alaska LLC
as 3:2024cv02702
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fennell and Lawn Tech of Alaska, LLC an Alaskan limited liability company doing business as Ken's Garden Center
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Company of Alaska, LLC
Adrienne Arrington et al v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arrington, Alecia Guarneros, Alexa Sanchez and others
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital Management LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Matson v O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Wesley A Matson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lettieri v. Matson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Karen Matson, The Broome County Humane Society, David Gaska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrikos, et al. v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
EVAGELOS ANDRIKOS, BRYANT BURNS, MICHAEL OLVERA and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY WHEELER
Defendant:
PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC, APS STEVEDORING, LLC and others
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
John M Dove
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Dove v. Matson Navigation Company Inc
as 3:2024cv05173
Plaintiff:
John M Dove
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Fennell et al v. Matson Navigation Company of Alaska LLC
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fennell and Lawn Tech of Alaska, LLC an Alaskan limited liability company doing business as Ken's Garden Center
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Company of Alaska LLC
US v. Dillinger Bolden
as 24-4100
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DILLINGER MATSON BOLDEN, a/k/a Nuke
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
