Cases 31 - 40 of 160
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
as 1:2021cv00191
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07055
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Britt v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad McBride, Christopher Rager, Anderson County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15432
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08527
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. United States of America
as 20-3856
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Davis v. United States of America
as 20-3857
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Davis v. United States of America
as 20-3886
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
ECOSAVE AUTOMATION, INC. et al v. DELAWARE VALLEY AUTOMATION, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv05564
Defendant:
HARRY J. IRRGANG, JR., MICHAEL J. HAGGARTY, JR., ENERGY TRANSFER SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ECOSAVE HOLDINGS, INC., ECOSAVE, INC. and ECOSAVE AUTOMATION, INC.
ECOSAVE AUTOMATION, INC. et al v. DELAWARE VALLEY AUTOMATION, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv05564
Defendant:
HARRY J. IRRGANG, JR., MICHAEL J. HAGGARTY, JR., ENERGY TRANSFER SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ECOSAVE HOLDINGS, INC., ECOSAVE, INC. and ECOSAVE AUTOMATION, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
