Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ZOOK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv06991
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. ZOOK
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv00823
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY CO. SHERIFF'S OFF., MONTGOMERY COUNTY and MONTGOMERY CO. POLICE DPT.
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2020cv03076
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE DEPT. and MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA, ET AL
as 1:2020cv00941
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, INDIANA MONTGOMERY COUNTY, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsen v. Montgomery County Indiana et al
as 1:2020cv00129
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Indiana State Police, Montgomery County Indiana, Montomery County Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chalik v. Turner et al
as 2:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Richard R. Turner, United Parcel Services, Inc. and Richard R Turner, Jr
Plaintiff:
Matthew G. Chalik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv04065
Defendant:
ESKENAZI HEALTH, ADKINS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ainsworth v. Commissioner
as 1:2014cv00255
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Ainsworth
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KISTLER v. TECHNICOLOR USA INC
as 1:2012cv01812
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. KISTLER
Defendant:
TECHNICOLOR USA INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
