Cases 1 - 10 of 381
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK and DR. OLGA A. KATZ
Respondent:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Smith v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Moshi v. Kia America, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P MOSHI and Qualitee Moshi
Defendant:
KIA AMERICA, INC and Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Matthew Dec v. County of Butler, et al
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER, BUTLER COUNTY PROBATION, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and others
Mitchell McGhee v. Matthew Brookman
as 23-3362
Petitioner:
MITCHELL MCGHEE
Respondent:
MATTHEW P. BROOKMAN
Jenkins v. Emm et al
as 3:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Jenkins
Defendant:
Ronald F. Emm and All Chemical Transport Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DEC v. BUTLER COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY, BUTLER COUNTY PROBATION, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
