Cases 41 - 50 of 223
Taylor Matthew Scott v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv04902
Plaintiff:
Taylor Matthew Scott
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Officer Torres, Jane Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HACKATHORN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07632
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SCOTT HACKATHORN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brauer v. Baratta Brothers, Inc. dba Fairway Packing Company
as 2:2022cv10597
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Brauer
Defendant:
Baratta Brothers, Inc. dba Fairway Packing Company
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Young et al
as 3:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Young and Manisha Pacius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Alexis Hunley, et al v. Instagram, LLC
as 22-15293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXIS HUNLEY and MATTHEW SCOTT BRAUER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
INSTAGRAM, LLC
Matthew Howard v. Joshua Hayes
as 21-7749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT CARSON HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA HAYES, MARTY STANLEY and TODD ELAM
Patton v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
as 3:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Patton
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08423
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc,, Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan Dixon v. Elizabeth Berns, et al
as 21-35902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN ADAM DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH BERNS, MATTHEW SCOTT GOGUEN and JIE LIANG GOGUEN
Defendant:
YVONNE CURTIS, JENNI R.W. HALLACK, CYNTHIA BUHR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
