Cases 21 - 30 of 2,246
Bryant et al v. Wilder et al
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Bryant and Ann W.E. Bryant
Defendant:
Kimberly Wilder, David Wilder and Attorney Matthew Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Foos et al v. Permian Resources Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Defendant:
Permian Resources Corp., Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Foos, Andrew A. Hund, Michael B. Ackerman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Brown v. Jantzen et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kelly Christian Brown
Defendant:
Matthew B. Jantzen, Benjamin B. Wilbughby, Troy S. Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kirkland v. RxBenefits, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kirkland
Defendant:
RxBenefits, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Rios (PS) v. Board of County Commissioners of Adams County, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Starr Rios
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Adams County, Colorado, Gene Caps, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Matthew Morales
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. et al et al
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jay G. Harris and Norma R. Moreno
Defendant:
Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. et al, Nabors Drilling USA LP, Matthew Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Larez et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Gary Larez, Brandon Stone, Dewayne Clements and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, GCCF, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
