Cases 1 - 10 of 998
Trejo v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo
Defendant:
U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President, Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dowell v. Kobayashi
as 24-20201
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Dowell
Defendant:
Warden H. Kobayashi, FDC Warden, Lieutenant Standley, Special Housing Unit Lieutenant, Lieutenant Brown, Lieutenant at FDC and others
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. American Municipal Services et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jackson
Defendant:
American Municipal Services, Larry Bergman, Greg Pitchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strong v. Matthews
as 24-40207
Plaintiff:
DeVon Sean Strong
Defendant:
Hillary R. Matthews, Mohamed L. Touchami, Patrick D. Coleman and others
Kenney et al v. Dallas County Texas
as 3:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kenney and Gregory Benedict
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobery v. Sissytrunk
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Mobery
Defendant:
Brady Sissytrunk
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
