Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Isham v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Isham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
White v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Matthew J White
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Ferry v. Ross et al
as 5:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Ferry
Defendant:
Lieutenant Tyler Ross, Deputy Cain, Deputy White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Angelica Lynn Matthews
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tate v. Durrett et al
as 5:2024cv05020
Plaintiff:
Zerahzhe Authentic Tate
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Matthew Durrett, Head Public Defender Blake Chancellor, Public Defender Candice Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boivin v. Huckabee-Sanders et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Matthew Boivin
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee-Sanders, Gary Mussellwhite and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
