Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Mattox v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Mattox
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnes v. Kentucky State Police Official Office et al
as 5:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Terquise Barnes
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Official Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Fayette County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Kentucky State Police et al
as 5:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Terquise Demarco Barnes
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police and Calvin Mattox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattox v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
John Mattox
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. One (1) Romarm/Cugir Draco Pistol, CAL:762, SN:DA827915 et al
as 2:2021cv02561
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) Romarm/Cugir Draco Pistol, CAL:762, SN:DA827915 and One (1) Glock GMBH 45 Pistol, CAL:9, SN:BPYU541
Claimant:
Kwame Brown, Savon Crawford, Richard Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Michael Mattox, Sr. v. CIR
as 21-1180
Petitioner:
MICHAEL K. MATTOX, SR.
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Mattox v. MHA
as 2:2021cv02025
Defendant:
MHA
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattox v. Lakeside Behavioral Health System
as 2:2021cv02014
Defendant:
Lakeside Behavioral Health System
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Mattox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattox v. MMHI
as 2:2021cv02017
Defendant:
MMHI
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Mattox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattox v. Western Mental Health Institute
as 2:2021cv02016
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Mattox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
